지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As shown in the cases of CSCE (Conference on Security Cooperation in Europe) and ARF (ASEAN Regional Forum), the United States tend to go ahead with multilateral security strategy to sustain their influence in certain regions when the strategic situation drives into a crisis. The Six-Party Talks in operation was chosen by the U.S. facing a similar strategic situation to the case of CSCE and ARF. Although Six-Party Talks have a multilateral negotiation form, they are not based on multilateralism but can be characterized as a containment policy. One of the characteristics of multilaeralism is reciprocity among all participating countries. According to institutionalism, the change of character of Six-Party Talks toward multilateralism can be seen in operation, having no dealing with U.S's initiative. Even though hegemonic states took a pivotal role in building certain multilateral dialogue bodies, with the institutionali- zation, the initial intention of hegemonic states was weakened and even changed. After all, even the hegemonic state can not control the institution at his free will. It means that there is no need to define it's character conclusively. Henceforth, Six-Party Talks should have ‘multi- lateralist’ characteristics and manage the North Korean nuclear issue based on multilateralism in the long run. To do so, it should take lessons from the cases of CSCE and ARF. The group of non-alliance and neutrality in Europe and ASEAN in Asia-Pacific played important roles in maturing and developing the institution and agenda based on comprehensive security, giving a boost to the possibility of cooperation in the field of security.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0