지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this paper analyzes China's North Korea Policy in the 2nd nuclear crisis and suggests Korea's policy alternatives. Korean peninsula again has suffered serious tension since last October. North Korea acknowledged resuming nuclear program in last October and withdrew Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty(NPT) in early 2003. North Korea aroused nuclear program to give pressure United States coming on negotiation table, to guarantee the survival of Kim jung-il regime, to secure nuclear capability, to press South Korea, and to get state autonomy from China. With the North Korea's reckless action makes China be a positive coordinator. China thought if North Korea really has a nuclear weapons and increases instability in Korea peninsular it will hinder for China's long plan for super power through modernization and economic growth in the world. Now China realized that North Korea become from old friend to new challenges. Besides that China faced increased pressures from the United States to take stronger measures to curb Pyongyang's nuclear programme. So China changed her stance from negative posture to positive towards North Korea nuclear issues. China changed her policy from ideological cooperation to practical cooperation, from isolated policy to core pole of regional diplomacy, and from 'lip-and-teeth' relation to limited military alliance with North Korea. In conclusion China has relation with North Korea status quo in short term, selective cooperation in the long run. With the North Korean nuclear crisis South Korea will restore the dislocated Korea-U.S. alliance, make selective cooperation with China, and elastic and strategic cooperation with North Korea.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0