지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.1
- 수록면
- 695 - 704 (10page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The physical fitness test battery using older adults was developed as an alternative to invasive and noninvasive clinical tests customarily performed on at-risk individuals or tests requiring expensive equipment and technical expertise. To evaluate the validity of self-report measures of physical fitness as substitutes for performance-based tests, self-reports and performance-based tests of physical fitness were compared. Subjects were a community -based sample of older adults aged 60 and over. The performance-based tests included endurance, flexibility, muscular strength, dynamic balance, coordination, and agility. The self-reports evaluation assessed selected individual subcomponents of fitness and used both peers and absolute standards as reference. The results showed that compared to performance -based tests, the self-report items were more strongly interrelated and they less effectively evaluated the different subdomains of physical fitness. Corresponding performance-based tests and self-reports items were weak to moderately associated. All self-report items were related most strongly with the performance-based endurance test. Apparently, older adults tend to estimate overall physical fitness, in which endurance plays an importance part, rather than individual subcomponents of physical fitness. Therefore, the self-report measures have limited validity as predictors of performance-based physical fitness for older people in the aging society.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0