메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
송일훈 (한양대학교) 손수범 (용인대학교) 이동헌 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한국체육사학회 한국체육사학회지 한국체육사학회지 제17권
발행연도
2006.1
수록면
83 - 100 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study researched traditional wrestling and Japanese wrestling’s origins, match types and histories of tournament. I made a comparative study of problems about traditional wrestling’s match process and management of tournament. For the improvement in ssireum, I proposed an alternative plan to integrate Japanese process with Korean traditional wrestling. There are 4 aspects which are full of suggestions. First of all, Japan has six arenas for the national sport only. So, Japanese can consider sumo a national sport. On the other hand, Korean wrestlers and interested people have wandered over the whole country because there is no arena for ssireum in Korea. Even, they seem to be a circus troupe. Second, sumo’s match is fair with lively tricks and management of tournament through single round system tournaments in 15 days but ssireum tournaments match for 4 days. Accordingly, it causes serious problems: not only someone who is dropped off at an elimination contest cannot watch other good players’ match in case of the best wrestlers’ elimination match but also the best wrestlers are placed in one side. Third, spectators are so excited in sumo because sumo wrestlers’ ceremony and their features are Japanese traditional style based on historically investigated literature. Unlike sumo, ssireum cannot attract spectators its appearances are completely different from historical literature. Lastly, since sumo’s wrestling match is close to the seats for the audience, it can build realism vividly but ssireum’s one is far from the seats.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0