개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한마취통증의학회(구 대한마취과학회) Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Vol.51 No.5
- 발행연도
- 2006.1
- 수록면
- 547 - 551 (5page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background: The hemodynamic changes associated with orotracheal intubation may result from direct laryngoscopy and the endotracheal intubation. This study evaluated and compared the cardiovascular changes after either Bonfils intubation fibrescope or conventional laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation.
Methods: Sixty patients, aged 20 to 30 years, were randomly allocated into two groups, the Bonfils intubation fibrescope group (BF group, n = 30) and conventional intubation using a rigid laryngoscope (LS group, n = 30). Bonfils intubation fibrescope or laryngoscopic oral endotracheal intubation was performed after inducing anesthesia. The systolic and diastolic arterial pressures, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation and intubation time were recorded before and after orotracheal intubation.
Results: In both groups, the systolic and diastolic arterial pressures increased significantly after endotracheal intubation. The heart rate increased significantly after the induction of anesthesia in both groups. However, the arterial blood pressure, heart rate and intubation time were similar in both groups.
Conclusions: The use of a Bonfils intubation fibrescope does not modify the hemodynamic response associated with endotracheal intubation compared with conventional laryngoscopy. (Korean J Anesthesiol 2006; 51: 547～51)
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0