지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There have been many debates about the fundamental reform of the Korean sexual violence law and jurisprudence. Reviewing the suggestions from moral conservatism, liberalism and radical feminism, this article argues that first the right to sexual autonomy should be understood as one which is based on the democratic and equal communications. The right to sexual autonomy would be infringed not only by a 'violent' sexual act, but also by a sexual act interpreted as not-violent, but based on the gender-distorted sexuality. "Sexuality" is not natural, but socially constructed by gender-power in our society. From this argument, this article criticizes the Korean sexual violence law and jurisprudence and suggests the reform alternatives. First, dichotomy between rape(sexual intercourse) and the other sexual act in Korean Penal Code should be altered by classification according to the degree of infringement of the right to sexual autonomy. Second, the marital rape exemption which is maintained by the Korean jurisprudence should be abolished. If necessary, we have to introduce the provision for punishment of marital sexual violence. Third, 'utmost resistance' requirement to establish the sexual violence crimes should be replaced by the 'reasonable resistance' requirement. Fourth, disagreed sexual act should be newly constructed as a sexual crime of lower grade. It would be regarded as a "sexual violence", because continuing the sexual act in disregard of partner's earnest 'no' infringes the right to sexual autonomy.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0