지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims at analysing how the compliance between submitted documents and terms and conditions of the credit would be determined under UCP 600 through in-depth comparison with relevant articles of UCP 500, providing solid foundation for credit practitioners to understand UCP 600. In comparison with UCP 500, this study finds that the rules in UCP 600 with respect to the standard of examination of the presented documents seem to provide better simplicity and clarity to the banks. This analysis is based on the facts that, under UCP 600, ① No mirror image of data is required, ② It introduces the rule that the documents other than the transport documents should be accepted when data content and the issuer are not clearly stated on the credit provided that it fulfills its function, ③ The detailed address of the beneficiary and applicant for the credit is disregarded, ④ The Issuer of transport documents can be a freight forwarder and NVOCC, etc. However, it seems that the provision of UCP 600 relating to non-documentary condition may invite further discussion as it may not be appropriate rule to cover various conditions which may be inserted in the credit.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0