지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, I make an attempt to refute Andrew Gibson's assertion that albeit Badiou's reading of Beckett in terms of the major concepts of his own philosophy, the process of post-evental fidelity and subjectivation, which is crucial in Badiou's ethics of the event, is entirely missing in Beckett's works.
My contention is that the place of the event in Worstward Ho, where the narrator, after the long ‘worstward’ process of 'saying on', pronounces the latest "nohow on," clearly demonstrates the nature of post-evental fidelity in Beckett. The fidelity here, the good in Beckett, consists in promising the "on," while pronouncing the "no," i.e., beginning the poetic naming of the event again without naming the unnamable. In other words, the whole text itself, which begins with the significant "On," is an act of fidelity to this event which will happen at the end of the text. This is what Badiou himself refers to as a 'futural' fidelity to an event. To prove this, I compare Badiou's reading of Worstward Ho with that of Improvisation of a Faun by Stéphane Mallarmé. In both writers the place and activity of the event is one and the same thing.
After introducing the two types of events in Beckett, I discuss how the beauty and the good is achieved in the poetic naming of events in Beckett. Badiou notes that beauty surges forth when we understand that the path of words(the multiple) goes counter to the demand of the thought(the one). Beauty takes place when the poetic naming of events seizes thought at the edge of the void superimposing the multiple onto the void.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0