지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study conducts a survey and tests whether Korean people believe that there are economies of scope in providing agricultural commodity and noncommodity outputs. The questionnaire suggests five alternative ways of providing commodity and noncommodity outputs. Each alternative contains different number of outputs provided by domestic producers. The respondents are requested to express their extent of support for each alternative considering the benefits and costs of each alternative. A panel ordered probit model is estimated. We find that there are strong economies of scope in multifunctional agriculture. Domestic production of agricultural commodity output is evaluated much more important than producing other noncommodity outputs such as environmental goods, rural amenity, rural viability and food security. Among the noncommodity outputs rural viability is assessed as the most valuable one.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0