지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
According to Ferdinand de Saussure's thesis of difference, there is nothing but difference in language. The core of this thesis is that difference is the principle of articulation: if there is something articulated in language, it is a effect of difference. Derrida and Deleuze, who represent contemporary philosophy of difference, generalize this structuralist idea, in such a way that everything in the world is to be understood as a gift of difference. The generalized thesis implies that there is nothing but relation in everything given to us: substantial entity is an illusive effect of differential relation. This generalization goes with a radicalization, which leads to the very heart of post-structuralist conception of difference: difference does not only give rise to a closed system of binary oppositions, but also open and demolish it. This implies that originary difference is neither one term which constitutes with identity or sameness a system of binary oppositions, nor any differential relation simply inherent to that system; it is the difference between inside and outside of the system that comes into question. This post-structuralist idea overlaps with the hegelian conception of difference as self-relating(or self-reflexive) difference. Insisting upon the central position this idea takes in Hegel' philosophy, I try to deduce structuralist and post- structuralist ideas of difference from it. However we must distinguish post-structuralist difference from hegelian one, because the former has an inorganic and non-teleological tendency in it's original state, while the latter result in an organic and teleological movement.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0