지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Most modern European philosophers have been concerned with the ‘erasing the self’ in their philosophical entrepreneur to confirm the relational existence of human beings usually in Heideggerian context. But Charles Sanders Peirce(1839-1914) already achieved a well formed way of semiotics in the slogan of ‘man as a sign.’ In this article, focusing on his semiotics, I study the representational view of icon in Peircean semiotics in which his icon works at the function of representation through image and other hypoiconic elements like diagram and metaphor. To do this I use and criticize Thomas Sebeok's and Joseph Ransdell's problematic arguments with iconic revelational theory of icon. In the section one and two, I identify the elemental function of intentionality and duration for icon being successful, then the meaning of conventional feature of the icon. In the other three sections, I want to be certain that the real role of the icon lies in the representation through which the iconic representation functions in one directed way retroductively or progressively. In this process the iconic representation is to ‘expose’ truth and its hermeneutic characteristics, namely the real meaning of self in the semiotic way. Though this semiotic revelation should not be posited in a metaphysical or mystic context. It is because Peirce did not want any metaphysical understanding of self, rather he really wished to amuse with ‘our’ self in the semiotic correlation.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0