메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김성용 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
사법발전재단 사법 사법 제1권 제4호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
215 - 245 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Ipso facto clauses may incur transaction costs due to renegotiations and, therefore, are ex post inefficient. Nevertheless, parties to a contract may have ex ante incentives to include an ipso facto clause in the contract. First, as the interests of insolvent debtors and estates are not aligned, a party can set the terms of the contract applicable when it remains solvent in its favor as compensation for allowing, when it becomes insolvent, the other party to be excused from its obligations under the contract or to obtain gains from renegotiation of the contract by invoking판례평석 the ipso facto clause. Such possibility of a party extracting private benefits at the expense of its investors engenders social inefficiency by discouraging investments for the projects the pursuit of which is socially desirable. Second, the risk of an insolvent party defaulting on its obligations under the contract that would otherwise be borne by the other party can be avoided by the ipso facto clause. Such avoidance of default risk after insolvency of a party is socially efficient in the sense that, by removing the need to offer compensation for that risk even before it is materialized, it encourages executions of contracts the performance of which is socially desirable. This conflict of competing policy goals makes it difficult to determine whether ipso facto clauses be enforceable or not.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0