지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2010.1
- 수록면
- 121 - 140 (20page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Inspired by my own experience of reading and translating a book written by a French translator, Antoine Berman, I am going to suggest my problematics in this paper as follows: (1) Translation is the threshold from which changes of a language begin and a window where the results of such changes show. (2) Therefore, translation provides a vital clue to the issue of nature or identity of a language. (3) After all, the matter of translation is that of language exceeding a level of communication and, at the same time, that of world views or thinking. In the main body, I argue that the issue of identity in language can be divided into two sides in tension; one that regards a language as a fixed invariable and the other that considers a language as a variable or moving. The former is mostly backed by paraphrasers, while the latter is supported by literalists. The former believes that a mother tongue is "untouchable" and communication is the core of a language and translation. The latter reckons that the nature of translation is pursuing changes and expansion of a mother tongue by introducing "the foreign". In this respect, Lawrence Venuti's approach of "foreignazation" and Gilles Deleuze's strategy of "minor language" are definitely worth noting. In conclusion, I agree on Berman's insight that "the nature of translation is opening, dialogue, hybrid and decenterment" and claim that Venuti pursues hybrid, while Deleuze seeks decenterment. As Luther emphasized a strong encounter with the foreign when he translated the bible in German, I insist that a close relation with the foreign texts is required for Korean to take shape.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0