지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The fact that a debate should persuasively express itself's opinion allows the possibility of contribution from rhetoric in regard to the debate since rhetoric has an object of providing an adequate method of persuasion in any argument. Aristotle introduces three factors as a method of persuasion in rhetoric: Speakers ethos(character), audiences' pathos(emotion), and seeking logos which itself is an argument. And with these means he specifies through 5 norms of idea, expression, arrangement, presentation, and process of memory. Idea defines related issues, makes an opinion to support the position, and finds the evidence.
In rhetoric's idea, there is a lot of duplication with the discovery of the basis of an argument in debate and provides a new idea in discovery of the basis of an argument which many debaters use. What is the most important to Aristotle in method of persuasion is 'logos which comes from the argument itself'. Therefore, in a situation where it is differentiated with dialectic, he discusses the rhetorical inference which is a unique method of persuasion of rhetoric. However, rhetorical inference is to do with argument method but not a practical content. It is necessary to have a premise or a basis of argument in rhetorical inference, and these are expressed as 말터, a sum of premisses, that is in other words topos. Topos has an original meaning of a 'place' which, in rhetoric, is a place where a speaker can look for the method of persuasion for application. Topos provides the available basis of arguments for different situations. This paper would discuss how topos, which plays a part of the basis of argument, contributes to the discovery of the basis of argument in debate.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0