지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korean Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act("MRFTA") has very
unique clause establishing Korean Fair Trade Mediation Agency. Article 23
of MRFTA was originated from the Japanese Antitrust Law, but far more
comprehensive than that. Due to the characteristic feature of the Article 23
of MRFTA, some scholars have argued that it has to be deleted from the
MRFTA and resolved into the civil litigations. Still many of the antitrust
experts in Korea think that Article 23 of MRFTA contains considerable
portion of public interest concerns. Under this circumstance, Korean Fair
Trade Mediation Agency can play a important role by solving the Article 23
of MRFTA cases through mediation considering the civil-dispute's nature
amongst the market players.
However, current role of Korean Fair Trade Mediation Agency is limited
pertaining to the Article 23 of MRFTA related issues. Not only the
mediation but also the arbitration also has to be given to the Korean Fair
Trade Mediation Agency to rbiionthem to resolve the disputes much more
effectively. EU's ADR Directive shios some important principles hionwe can
extend the Korean Fair Trade Mediation Agency's area's of ae Kority.
Given the shirt history of Korean Fair Trade Mediation Agency, it's past
track record has been remarkable. Empowering them more areas such as
disputes re subcontractors will lessen the burden of Fair Trade Commission
128 영남법학 제29호 2009. 10
and rbiionthem to focus on the genuine antitrust cases like abuse of market
dtionant position or cartel and so on.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0