지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Our Copyright Act introduced performers' moral rights (the integrity right, the paternity right) in 2006. The intent of this new legislation for performer's right (moral right) is that, despite the propose protecting the spiritual interest of a performer on prejudicial mutilation or distortion of performance of a performer according to the development of digital technology, a performer is a substantial creator rather than a simple communicator of a work. Therefore a performer enjoys his moral right: a performer has the integrity right to prohibit the third from mutilating and distorting his performance, and paternity right to sign his name, his name, and his professional name or not to sign his name. But our existing copyright law appears to have several problems in the article of a performer' moral right. First, it is doubtful to be rational that the provision in Copyright Act that defines a movie director that acts an original work as a performer, a person who holds neighboring right. Second, is it valid that the special contract that a performer, an actor in a film sings the contract with a movie producer that won't exercise or waiver his integrity right. Third, it is also doubtful that our exiting copyright Act, Contrary to the moral right of the author after his death, doesn't confer the posthumous protection of moral right upon a performer. Is this valid? When we think of it, it is true that our copyright Act confers the performer the moral right to worldwide reach. On the other hand, the powerful protection of a performer' moral right shall reduce the economical value of the performance. The legislation that is meeting the interest of both performer and user of performance is required.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0