메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제20권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
51 - 74 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Criminal Procedure Act regulates certain process to protect the victim of crime, but the system is insufficient. Especially the regulations in the Criminal Procedure Act need to be reinforced to actively protect the victim of crime. The victim should be provided a public defender if needed and be accepted to participate in the criminal trial. At the trial the application for challenge should be allowed. The revised Criminal Procedure Act has improved at protecting the victim of crime, but still needs additional progress in several areas. There is some opinion that the prosecution compelling system exists to regulate Prosecutorial discretion, instead of protecting the right for the victim of crime. However since the claim for prosecution compelling is taken back when the victim of crime withdraws the complaints, it should be the other way around. In this way the effect that regulates Prosecutorial discretion is additional. The biggest flaw about the current prosecution compelling system is that after the prosecution compelling is accepted, the Prosecutor has to maintain the public prosecution. When the court overrules the disposition for non-prosecution after going through prosecution compelling and prosecution appeal, there’s no reason to compel the Prosecutor to sustain the public prosecution. By going through the procedure, the lack of trust to the Prosecutor will lead the victim of crime against the idea. Moreover the Prosecutor will have self contradiction maintaining the public prosecution when he/she thinks the accused is not guilty. Instead of this, the attorney of the victim of crime should maintain the public prosecution. A public defender should be available if needed, since the victim of crime has rights to be advised by an attorney. In this way, the protection of the victim of crime and regulating Prosecutorial discretion can both be done, and the court will no longer have to do both the prosecution and trial at the same time.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0