메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
송정란 (건양대학교)
저널정보
한국문예창작학회 한국문예창작 한국문예창작 제7권 제1호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
295 - 320 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As the necessity of writing education is underlined recently, the existing education has been converted into more subdivided and professional one according to the characteristics of each major field. Differentiated from the previous integrated writing system covering all the areas, writing education specialized for each domain has been put emphasis on now, and its phenomenon seems to be much more reinforced thanks to the social demand for capable workers of practical experience. In this paper, taking universities for instance whose writing systems are specialized for each department now, the present state of writing education of engineering departments was investigated, and the writing materials and their contents based on the index was also analyzed. In the result, the writing materials of each university could be divided into ‘Specialized Writing’and ‘Integrated Writing’in terms of the pattern of their composition, and when the actual curriculum was studied, almost all of the universities were found out to operate the system of integrated writing. Besides, according to the contents of the curriculum, they were classified into 3 patterns such as ‘Integrated-Topic Composition’, ‘Lecture-Centered Composition’ and ‘Problem-Solving Composition’, but most importantly, it could be judged that the materials dealing with all the 3 patterns properly be the most effective ones. On the base of this discussion, a new table of contents for writing of engineering departments was composed with the contents of a new curriculum. The integrated pattern was chosen for the curriculum composition, and since the materials were premised on lectures of 16 weeks for one semester, general writing was provided prior to the mid-term exam, and specialized writing for engineering departments was provided after it. The contents of the curriculum were designated for ‘Topic- Integrated Type’and ‘Problem-Solving Type’to be applied according to the characteristics of each chapter. The Part 3 was about understanding and practice of writings on technical topics, which was ‘Topic-Integrated Type’dealing with writings of exact expressions through reasonable thoughts. The Part 4 was‘ Problem-Solving Type’ which combined the knowledge on the majors of engineering departments and writing to create various ways of writing on technical topics. As mentioned above, the composition of writing materials for engineering departments was attempted. It seemed that there would be many aspects which should be modified and supplemented if an actual compiling of new writing materials were taken into an action. It is sure that writing education of a semester-lasting curriculum cannot improve students’writing ability remarkably. But, the development of education should be keep going on so that most students in engineering departments who have prejudice against writing may approach the field of writing more easily and they may get closer to the writing education needed for a better social career.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0