지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 16(2), 69-91. This study examines the constructive and semantic nature of the "be" equivalent (which is closely related to the Korean "ida") in various different languages from the perspective of comparative linguistics. We have classified the 'be' equivalent under three semantic categories as follows: Category A (simple "to be"), Category B ("to exist"), and Category C ("to become"). Upon investigation of the 'be' form in several different languages, we have conclusively found that the semantic definition of ‘be’ in some languages is clearly divided while in other languages this is not the case. Furthermore, such phenomena is closely associated with the syntactic structure of each language. For example, in languages such as Sumerian or the Altaic languages in which the preposition does not exist and the postposition or suffix is developed, the semantic division of the 'be' equivalent is apparent. In other languages such as the Semitic or Indo-European languages in which the preposition is developed, the division is not as obvious, and we find that a single word may be classified under more than one category. Also, while the "be"in categories B and C is considered to be a verb in all languages, the "be" in category A such as 'ida' in Korean, 'me' in Sumerian, 'ma' in Akkadian, and ‘yeh’ in classical Chinese is not considered to be a verb and is merely an indicator of the predicate.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0