지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Providing nine kinds of phenomena, Lee (2009: 130-149) tries to disprove the double clause approach (DCA) to the right dislocated construction (RDC) like Tanaka's (2001) elliptical bi-sentential analysis and Chung's (2008a, 2009) elliptical coordination analysis. This paper shows, however, that the phenomena pointed out by Lee (2009) as problems for the DCA do not in fact constitute real problems, either because some alternative analyses are available or because his data is not extensive enough. It will be also shown that Lee's (2007a, b, 2009) single clause analysis based on Kayne's (1994) universal SVO word order hypothesis faces difficulties (in addition to the ones pointed out by Chung 2009) accounting for the existence of subject (as well as object) appendix and for the absence of LCA effects in the gapless RDC. If we stay on the right track, the RDC cannot be taken as evidence for the claim that Korean conforms to the universal SVO word order hypothesis, pace Lee (2007a, b, 2009).
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0