메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한응급의학회 대한응급의학회지 대한응급의학회지 제22권 제4호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
329 - 334 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The Trauma Scoring System is used for triage and treatment decision-making of injured patients. An ideal scoring system should have predictive validity, correlate with outcome, be easily applicable, and be reliably applied among observations. The purpose of this study was to analysis the trauma scoring system to predict motor vehicle accident (MVA) survival and mortality. Methods: The registry data of MVA trauma patients admitted to W hospital between October 2008 and December 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. The dependent variable of interest was patient survival (coded as live or die). The independent variables used in the study included the full term for ISS (ISS) derived using Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) and body system maximum AIS scores, full term (ICISS) score, full term (RTS) and full term (TRISS). Survival predictability in each scoring system (ISS, RTS TRISS, ICISS and ICISS full model) was compared. Results: Trauma severity scores of the 1,843 patients [1,163 males (63.1%), 680 females (36.9%); mean age 41.7±20.9 years] were: RTS 7.36±3.23 (median: 7.84),ISS 6.42±8.42 (median: 4), TRISS 0.952±0.153 (median:0.994), ICISS 0.970±0.055 (median: 0.990), and ICISS full model 0.982±0.104 (median: 0.998). To analyze the predictive validity of the receiver operation characteristic (ROC)curve analysis, ISS 0.956, ICISS 0.522, ICISS full model 0.398, RTS 0.095, and TRISS 0.368 appeared to predict the validity of the widest area of the ROC curve area, with ISS being most reliable. Conclusion: ISS is the best predictor of survival than the other derived other scoring systems for MVA patients.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0