지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There has been a lot of empirical studies on the deterrent effect of
punishment. In general, these studies have shown inconsistent findings.
This suggests that deterrence theory's basic explanatory frame have some
flaws. First of all, the assumption of rational choice is problematic
especially when it is applied to the explanatory model for criminal
behaviors. And deterrence theory, at least in its basic version, does not
properly consider the effectiveness of informal social sanctions. Most
importantly, this theory needs to take into account the role of
decision-makers' characteristics in the calculation of perceived outcomes
of their criminal behaviors. Those characteristics might determine the sizes
of weights which definitely affect his or her evaluation of costs and
benefits from a specific criminal behavior. And criminological theories
provide useful information on those characteristics. Therefore, it is
necessary to have more elaborated deterrence models which take into
account the factors from other criminological theories to examine the
effect of punishment properly. In addition, we need to remember the fact
that only a part of population tends to engage in the rational calculation
regarding the outcomes of their criminal behaviors. Most people do not feel
the need for that calculation because they have internalized norms. And the
size of the group who would be willing to calculate the outcomes of their
criminal behaviors might vary with different natures of crimes. In addition,
other important issues on the effect of punishment are discussed.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0