메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이천현 (한국형사정책연구원)
저널정보
한국형사정책학회 형사정책 형사정책 제20권 제2호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
11 - 39 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As social activities of corporations or groups have increased, the increase of offenses committed by the organizations have followed. To control these crimes, a variety of sanctions are devised. The diverse sanctions include criminal sanctions applied by Provisions of Dual Punishment (the provisions charging both corporations and wrongdoers), the surcharge as an administrative sanction, measures to ensure the performance of duties such as an administrative publicity and reject of supply, etc. However, these policies to control corporate crimes have limits. Recently, introduction of newly formed punishment has been proposed. They are as follows: introduction of provision to forfeit and to impose additional charge to the corporation, formal publicity of conviction, equity fines, community service, probation, restitution, remedial order, and disorganizing the corporations. These proposals are considered, in a positive way, as they are designated to make unique criminal sanctions for corporations based on the differences of characteristic between companies and natural persons. Despite the appraisal, they are not introduced. This paper analyzed recent tendency of policies, especially focused on which policies are presented to control the corporate offenses in 2000s, and suggested possible solutions for the future.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0