메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국지식재산학회 산업재산권 산업재산권 제30호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
295 - 330 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is extremely unreasonable that a new bill revising the Korean Copyright Act is trying to recognize the right of publicity as part of copyright law. It’s because of the following reasons: In US where the right of publicity first emerged and still has been strongly protected, the mainstream of academic discussions and actual legislations have been based on not copyright law but unfair competition law. The traditional justification argument for copyright such as incentive theory is not well compatible with the right of publicity which is just a byproduct, not the direct result from such incentive. Even though the Korean Copyright Act already protects the subjects matter (an actor’s stage performance as well as a database) which lacks originality, it is quite a different issue whether the Act could also subsume the right of publicity. The individual provisions of rather the Korean Unfair Competition Act than the Korean Copyright Act is more related with the right of publicity. Some decisions by Korean courts implicitly took a position favoring that the right of publicity was belonging to the unfair competition law area. Therefore, the future legislation for the right of publicity should be done under the principles of unfair competition law.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0