메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
안암법학회 안암법학 안암법학 제32호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
1 - 29 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
‘Qualifications System', allowing a person who has acquired a certain qualification to choose an occupation where such occupation deals with people's life, health and safety, or requires professional knowledge and technology, is implemented. Korean Constitutional Court decided that “in establishing the qualifications system on the professional field, the legislature may freely structure its contents by considering its purpose and in accordance with the policy- making decision. Accordingly, the decision of the legislature should be respected unless the content of qualifications system is explicitly unreasonable and unfair." In the same context, the Constitutional Court has applied more moderate standard of review than one with general cases which limit the freedom of occupation. However, it is unreasonable to determine cases in standardized way by applying the same rules merely because of the qualifications system. The Court must apply the above standard of review for the fundamental matters(essential matters which involve in the formation of qualifications system) such as the establishment of qualification requirements and the scope of the qualification's effect. Otherwise(where the purpose or contents of the limitation is not originated from the qualifications system itself), the Court should apply the balance review pursuant to the Constitution of Korea Article 37 (2) by considering the purpose or necessity of the limitation, nature and contents of the limited occupation, and degrees or methods of the limitation because in such case, it is not different from the general occupation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0