메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
고세일 (배재대학교)
저널정보
안암법학회 안암법학 안암법학 제26호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
279 - 317 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
While studying background, characteristics – especially as one right of personality, concrete types of moral rights, this author has examined domestic and international copyright law of the moral rights in this article. In addition, this author has considered its possible role of moral rights in digital era. Moral rights have been estimated as the legacy of Civil Law countries. This viewpoint is assured by the fact that moral rights have had quite a broad protection in Civil Law jurisdictions. On the other hand, the non-economic rights have relatively been protected under the minimal criteria in Common Law countries. Probably this distinction has come from the fundamental differences of cultures and perspectives concerning the moral rights. Therefore, without having a mutual understanding to these different philosophies, two legal systems may be unable to achieve any agreement regarding these rights. Furthermore, it could be huge obstacles for international intellectual property harmonization. Considering the apprehension of Common Law countries as to the moral rights, their concerns might be that some Civil Law countries do not permit the waiver of the moral rights and therefore in cases the abuse of the moral rights may occur as well. In this respect, building reasonable guidelines, there should be protection of authors in the perspective, in which authors are as same as their created works. These guiding principles may be given by legislations – domestic and international levels, but accumulations of a number of judgments of courts might provide the concrete spheres of moral rights.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0