지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
FIO terms are widely used in the voyage charter parties in Korean practices. Under the FIO terms, several issues are raised. The first issue is whether the shipowner's liability to load and discharge is shifted to the charterer or not. In the Korean Supreme Court case 2010.4.15. Docket No. 2007da50649, the Court accepted that the liability of the carrier (shipowner) to load, stow and discharge is shifted to the charterer. The second issue is whether the FIO terms is null and void because it makes the carrier less liable than the Korean Commercial Code Art. 795 and thus it is against the obligatory provision of Art. 799, which is equivalent to Hague-Visby Rules Art. 3(8). In the above case, the Court rendered that it was not against Art. 799.
The authors address legal issues of FIO term and analyse the judgment of the above Korean Supreme Court on the meaning of FIO term and submit a proposal for improving the legal status of the FIO term in the Korean Commercial Code.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0