지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to find out the test for distinguishing “transformative use” as a fair use of a copyrighted work from mere “transformation” as a preparation for a derivative work of the work. The test for the distinction is necessary because over- or under-interpretation of the terms might be able to make meaningless either fair use or right to prepare a derivative work, which, in turn, might result in breaking the balance between the dissemination and concentration of copyrighted information.
This article tries to achieve the goal by analyzing federal supreme court and circuit court cases. One second circuit case, Castle Rock Entertainment v. Carol Publishing Group, mentioned the difference between “transforming an original work into a derivative work” and “using an original work for a transformative purpose.” The court said that mere transformation does not reach transformative use, while transformative use does not require transformation. Thus, mere transformation means altering manners or modes of expression, while transformative use means altering the purpose of the use.
This article also proposes another test for distinguishing transformative use from mere transformation for the interpretation of the future fair use provision of Korea Copyright Act. This article proposes that the minimum range of transformative use can be the use of an original work that shows different ideas or feelings from those of the original work.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0