지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Except with respect to the limit of liability, the automobile liability insurance afforded applies seperately to each insured. This is the severability of interest clause. Korean Standard Automobile Insurance Policy says the clause applies to the workers compensation exclusion clause. But it is just a example of the severability of interest. Therefore, all clauses under the bodily liability insurance except the limit of liability the policy should apply seperately to each insured. That is the severability of interest theory. And even though the policy doesn't contain any severability of interest clause the bodily liability clauses should apply seperately to each insured. The supreme court and the majority stands for the theory.
But the supreme court misjudged the severability of interest theory in the case described above. Even though the driving agent is one of the additional insureds the court decided that the compulsory bodily liability insurance did not bear responsibility to pay for the victim of the driving agent. This conclusion goes against the severability of interest theory and many former cases of the supreme court.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0