메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김지환 (경남대학교)
저널정보
한국상사판례학회 상사판례연구 상사판례연구 제21권 제4호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
3 - 37 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Stock of the close corporation is typically owned by a small number of shareholders. The directors and shareholders may in some cases be the same individuals. By the way, the majority shareholders dominate the management of close company. The doctrine of majority rule creates the possibility for majority shareholders to make decisions which further their own interests at the expense of the minority owners. Moreover, the majority shareholders often oppress the minority with the unfair prejudice. Therefore, The UK Company Law has developed to 'oppression and remedy of minority shareholders. The doctrine of shareholder oppression attempts to safeguard the close corporation minority investor from the improper exercise of majority control. First, this thesis examines how protect minority shareholders against oppression or unfair prejudice on a comparative analysis of the United Kingdom, United State America, German and Japan . A review of remedies for shareholder disputes in the UK, USA, German and Japan reveals considerable diversity in company law. The UK and USA has adopted the measures for the relief, that is, court's ordering one or more members to purchase the shares of other members. German has the expulsion remedy. But we have not the relief statutory for minority shareholders oppressed in the company's affairs such as the UK, USA, German. Conclusionally, I think, it is necessary to adopt the Uk way of remedy. And it is necessary to adopt unconditional appraisal remedy under the particulars matters.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0