메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김두진 (부경대학교)
저널정보
한국상사판례학회 상사판례연구 상사판례연구 제21권 제1호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
73 - 106 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
While controversy over which types of trade practice should be illegal is heat in almost areas of antitrust law, We can reach one consensus that the hard-core cartels such as price-fixing, bid rigging, market allocation should be condemned. The leniency program is a means of attacking the hard-core cartels. Competition authorities may be able to destabilize more cartels if they explicitly focus on ways to create distrust among cartel members through enhancing the transparency, objectiveness, and incentives of the leniency program. Since the leniency program has improved into the Anti-monopoly and Fair trade Act in 1996, it has evolved toward those ends by a number of amendments. In order to qualify for amnesty, the current leniency program requires that the applicant corporation did not coerce another party to participate in the cartel activity and clearly was not the leader of the activity. The leader of the cartel should, however, be eligible for leniency, because there is difference between the coercion and leading in the light of the degree of condemnation and importantly, if she is not then others can trust him or her not to reveal the price-fixing to the government.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0