메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국제거래법학회 국제거래법연구 국제거래법연구 제19권 제2호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
77 - 104 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Buyer must examine the goods and give notice of the lack of conformity, if any, to the seller in order to retain his right to rely on the fact. The concept of the lack of conformity contains the conformity of quality, quantity, description, delivery of different goods and documents. The buyer’s examination of goods forms the basis of his obligation to notify the seller of defects under Article 39(1) in the CISG. And the obligation to examine the goods can give seller the econd opportunity to complete his duty fully, if possible, by delivering the missing goods or ubstitute goods, by repair, or by educing the buyer’s loss in some other way. As the determining of ‘within as short a period as is practicable in the circumstances’ in Article 38 is depending on the circumstances concerned with the particular case. So the term ‘reasonable time’ has proven too imprecise due to its flexibility without defined uniform scale to assist the practitioners in a uniform application of Art. 39(1). Article 38 is silent about the method the buyer should employ in examining the goods. In general, the manner of inspection will depend on the parties’s agreement, trade usages and practices in the absence of such indicators, a reasonable examination, through and professional examination is required. When determining which requirement must be satisfied by the buyer is specifying the nature of any lack of conformity, a mixed objective-subjective standard should be applied, which has regard to the respective commercial situation of the buyer and seller, to any cultural differences, but above all, to the nature of the goods. The obligations of the seller to deliver the goods which are free from third party rights or claims are examined, including the claims of third party for general rights, the claims for intellectual or industrial property, the buyer’s obligation to give notice of the third party claims compared with the obligation to notice the lack of conformity of the goods. The purpose of the Article 38 and 39(1) deadline for examination and notice of the lack of conformity is to allow the buyer an opportunity to discover defects before the buyer resells, and permit prompt clarification of whether the buyer accepts the goods as conforming.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0