메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국제거래법학회 국제거래법연구 국제거래법연구 제18권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
139 - 162 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
An Act to give effect to the Convention on the Contract for the International carriage of Goods by Road signed at Geneva on 19th May 1956; it has applied contracts for the international Carriage of Goods by Road in Europe. A model legal regime on inter-American carriage of goods by road was adopted at the Sixth Inter-American Specialized conference on Private International Law(CIDIP-Ⅵ), held at the OAS. Therefore, there is no Convention in Asia like that of the CMR, but it is necessary to review the Act on Carriage of Goods by Road in Korea. On examination the liability of the carrier by road under CMR, HGB and Korean Commercial Law, there are different views on the basis of liability. On the other side, third-party logistics has developed rapidly, but we could not cope with this problem. According to the Korean Commercial Law, the carrier's liability is based on proof of fault, and that liability is limited to the value of goods fixed according to the place and time of delivery. So unlike that of CMR, HGB, that regulation is discretion, and has not application to the extra-contractual liability for loss, damage or delay. I propose that adopt a sum of money limitation of carrier's liability. And in case where the extra-contractual liability is in issue, the carrier avail himself of the provision fix or limit the compensation due. What kind of responsible is considered for the Carrier of Multimodal Transport of Goods or 3PL. There are network liability system and uniform liability system. I think, uniform liability system is more reasonable than network liability system.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0