메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국제거래법학회 국제거래법연구 국제거래법연구 제18권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
47 - 70 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The aim of this study is to review investment chapter in Korea-US FTA(KORUS FTA). The Investment chapter in KORUS FTA is the compromised outcome of the negotiation between Korea and the US. While the US side argued to negotiate based upon the 2004 US BIT model texts, Korea wanted to maintain consistency with the previous FTA and BITs that Korea has concluded. As a result, texts of investment chapter in KORUS FTA are similar to 2004 US BIT model but the investment chapter also accommodates Korea's concerns in many respects. For instances, safeguard measures are recognized for Korea and the special sacrifice requirement is specified in connection with expropriation. Also, Korean language as well as English can be used for arbitration procedures. Since lots of controversies are generated with regard to Investor-State Dispute Settlement(ISDS), it is meaningful to see how all the issues are incorporated in the investment chapter of KORUS FTA. There are certain implications for the purposes of implementing KORUS FTA and preparing future negotiations with other countries. First, it is necessary to use KORUS FTA as a template for the future FTA negotiations. Such attempt may provide consistency and predictability for the investors as well as the countries concerned. Second, it is necessary to evaluate the implication of "the future MFN" clause for the future negotiation with other countries. If a more favourable treatment for investors or investments are provided in any future FTA after KORUS FTA enters into force, such treatment may affect KORUS FTA. Therefore, FTA negotiation for liberalization of the investment needs more caution considering possible spill-over effects on KORUS FTA. Third, it is necessary to prepare a possible dispute by collecting and analysing ISDS cases and modifying the domestic system. Such a concern is legitimate in the sense that there still exist vague areas in terms of ISDS procedures despite of the detailed texts of KORUS FTA. Finally, it is necessary to minimize risks that Korean government and investors may assume through ISDS by deepening understanding on overall arbitration procedures.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0