지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is against the traditional position that 'hada' of 'yumyeong-hada' is a derivational suffix, arguing that it should be analyzed as a support verb like support verb 'ida'. My argumentation is grounded on their similarity on the syntactico-semantic level. It means that the lexemes X's in the construction 'X-hada' and lexemes Y's in the construction 'Y-ida' behave the same syntactico-semantically. For this, I compared 'yumyeong-hada' with 'gyeongjejeok-ida'. Both 'yumyeong(=famous)' and 'gyeongjejeok(=economic)' do not function as a argument of predicates, and show the same adjectival properties, so that 'ida' and 'hada' are in complementary distribution. I define this kind of lexemes as 'nouny adjectives', including 'adnominals' in contrast with verby adjectives such as 'keuda(=be big)', 'nopta(=be high)', etc.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0