지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Songxingtong seems like Tanglüshuyi, because the penal code of Tang and its commentary take the major part of this book. Modelling after Zhouxingtong, it was very much related with the traditional law consciousness that the penal code was too authoritative to be amended. But Songxingtong, as a basic code of Song Dynasty, could not be only composed of laws in the first half of Tang Dynasty. Besides various notes, many statutes, ordinances, regulations, decrees and proposals were supplemented and had legal force associated with the penal code. This formation of code could include the new changes up to its date as well as the successions to legal tradition, which suggests the characteristics of the judicial system and its ideology in Song Dynasty. Nearly all of the decrees and proposals in Songxingtong are explicitly published after the second half of Tang Dynasty. But most of statutes, ordinances, regulations without clear issue date were generally regarded as those of Kaiyuan Period, the first part of Tang. Nevertheless, all of them were still legally valid in early Song, and there are a few convincing evidences to show that some of them were revised or made after the Rebellion of An Lushan. No one can confirm that all of them are free from the new trends in the so-called ‘Tang-Song Transition’ since then. Moreover, the revisions were concentrated on the laws deeply related with the daily life of common people, so the changes found in them more deserve our investigation. Even though the statutes can not be the proofs of the Kaiyuan Statutes, many significant historical facts may be derived from them. This is why we need an annotated translation of Songxingtong.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0