지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to compare two conceptions of freedom, i.e. freedom as non-interference and freedom as non-domination, which represent respectively liberalism and republicanism, and to show relative advantages of the latter. Especially, I take up P. Pettit’s theory of freedom and try to combine it with G. MacCallum’s formulation, according to which freedom is to be understood as a triadic relation. Pettit proposes a conception of freedom as non-domination, which accommodates Berlin’s insightful distinction between negative and positive liberty, but overcomes shortcomings of Berlin’s theory. By focusing attention on freedom-impediments, I develop two arguments. First, critically examining conceptions of freedom as non-interference in light of qualitative features of freedom, I claim that the non-interference conception of freedom pays little attention to negative external constraints of freedom which are of great significance for the sociopolitical dimension of freedom. Second, analyzing some decisions of the Korean Constitutional Court, I argue that freedom as non-domination can help the Court form a reasonable conception of freedom which shows a principled consistency and integrity.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0