메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김지영 (대구과학대학교) 안상희 (대구가톨릭대학교)
저널정보
한국조리학회 Culinary Science & Hospitality Research Culinary Science & Hospitality Research Vol.27 No.12(Wn.137)
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
83 - 94 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the physical quality characteristics, sensory properties, and antioxidant activities of muffin with 0%, 3%, 6%, 9% and 12% nectarine powders. Organic acid in nectarin powders were citric acid, malic acid, succinic acid, and acetic acid. The specific gravity of muffins prepared by adding the more nectarine powders were higher than control group. In addition, the height, volume, specific volume, and baking loss rate of the control were higher than other group that using muffins with nectarine powders, however the weight was lower than control group. The moisture content and pH of the samples with nectarine powder were lower than control group. DPPH radical scavenging activity of the control was 35.40%, whereas the samples with nectarine powder ranged from 42.06∼56.06%. In crumb color, the L and a value were decreased, but b value was increased significantly by addition of nectarine powder. The hardness, chewiness, and brittleness of textural properties of muffin with 12% nectarine powder were lower than those of the control. Sensory evaluation scores in terms of flavor, taste and overall preference of groups with 3%, 6% and 9% of nectarine powder were not any significant difference when compared to the control. Based on the above results, less than 12% of nectarine powder would be proper to make muffins.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 재료 및 방법
3. 결과 및 고찰
4. 요약 및 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (44)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-594-000121456