지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In many of Germanic and Romance languages, ‘be’ is or was used as a perfect auxiliary for some intransitive verbs, which indicates there are some common properties in such verbs. Syntactically, some linguists argue they are unaccusative verbs which do not assign ACCUSATIVE case although they have an internal argument. Some semanticists suggest semantic concepts such as telicity or agentivity affect the selection of the perfect auxiliary. In this paper, I try to find out more adequate explanation in the case of English, based on some examples of Old English and Middle English in Visser(1970). Through the analysis of the examples, I argue ‘be+past participle’ began as a ‘resultative form’ and was expanded to perfect aspect.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0