메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대구가톨릭대학교 인문과학연구소 인문과학연구 인문과학연구 제24호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
49 - 73 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In these days, the expression, ‘scientific’ is a synonym for ‘objective’ or ‘reliable’. In this paper, I have tried to examine of the scientific character of so-called ‘qualitative research’ which became a major alternative method in the various social sciences. There are many kinds of methods in the qualitative researches: narrative research, phenomenological research, grounded theory research, ethnographic research and case study etc. Each method has a specific character. However, it means that it is hard to grasp the identity of qualitative research itself. Generally speaking, the qualitative research is regarded as a non-quantitative research. The quantitative researches have a common identity by using a mathematic of statistical method, while qualitative researches have many differences in each research domain. Despite of methodological ambiguousness qualitative research has to be regarded as a significant method in various social researches, because the meaning of actions of human being and of social relations could not be explicated by a quantitative method. However, it is not obvious, how qualitative researches satisfy of the criterion of scientific research: objectivity and universality. I have argued that the phenomenological qualitative research is a good candidate to satisfy the criterions.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0