Prognostic Factors of Surgical Outcome after Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Keishi Maruo; Toshiya Tachibana; Shinichi Inoue; Fumihiro Arizumi; Shinichi Yoshiya

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Keishi Maruo (Hyogo College of Medicine) Toshiya Tachibana (Hyogo College of Medicine) Shinichi Inoue (Hyogo College of Medicine) Fumihiro Arizumi (Hyogo College of Medicine) Shinichi Yoshiya (Hyogo College of Medicine)

저널정보: 대한척추외과학회 Asian Spine Journal Asian Spine Journal Vol.9 No.5

발행연도: 2015.1

수록면: 705 - 712 (8page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Study Design: A retrospective case review. Purpose: To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes and identify the predictive factors associated with poor clinical outcomes after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy (LSPSL) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Overview of Literature: LSPSL is an effective surgical treatment for LSS. Special care should be taken in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). Methods: A consecutive retrospective case review of patients undergoing LSPSL for LSS with a minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. Mild DLS and mild degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) were included in the study. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and recovery rate were reviewed. Poor clinical outcome was defined as a recovery rate <50% using Hirabayashi’s method. Results: A total of 52 patients (mean age, 72 years) met the inclusion criteria and had a mean follow-up of 2.6 years (range, 2–4.5 years). The preoperative diagnosis was LSS in 19, DS in 19, and DLS in 14 cases. The mean JOA score significantly increased from 14.6 to 23.2 at the final follow-up. The overall mean recovery rate was 60.1%. Thirteen patients (25%) were assigned to the poor outcome group. A higher rate of pre-existing DLS was observed in the poor outcome (poor) group (good, 15%; poor, 62%; p =0.003) than in the good outcome (good) group. None of the patient factors examined were associated with a poor outcome. A progression of slippage ≥5 mm was found in 8 of 24 patients (33%) in the DS group. A progression of curvature ≥5° was found in 5 of 14 patients (36%) in the DLS group. The progression of scoliosis and slippage did not influence the clinical outcome. Conclusions: The clinical and radiographic outcomes of LSPSL for LSS were favorable. Pre-existing DLS was significantly associated with poor clinical outcome.

참고문헌 (4)

참고문헌 신청

Mardjetko SM / 1994 / Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a meta-analysis of literature 1970-1993 / Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19(20 Suppl):2256S~2265S

양주철 / 2013 / Analysis of Factors Contributing to Postoperative Spinal Instability after Lumbar Decompression for Spinal Stenosis / 대한척추신경외과학회지 10(3):149~154

Jun Takahashi / 2014 / Comparison of Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy versus Conventional Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis / Asian Spine Journal 8(6):768~776

Jefri Henky / 2014 / Trumpet Laminectomy Microdecompression for Lumbal Canal Stenosis / Asian Spine Journal 8(5):667~674

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!