메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정지혜 (서울대학교) 곽영호 (서울대학교) 이진희 (서울대학교) 김도균 (서울대학교) 장익완 (서울대학교) 정진희 (서울특별시보라매병원) 정재윤 (분당서울대학교병원) 권혁술 (분당서울대학교병원)
저널정보
대한응급의학회 대한응급의학회지 대한응급의학회지 제26권 제5호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
474 - 479 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: We evaluated the relationship between changes in the trend of the utilization of diagnostic imaging studies and the rates of negative appendectomy, complications in pediatric patients with appendicitis. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at a pediatric emergency department (PED) of a tertiary university hospital. Patients who underwent imaging studies under the clinical impression of acute appendicitis and underwent appendectomy at the hospital from 2010 to 2013 were enrolled. We compared the percentages of imaging studies performed and negative appendectomy rate (NAR), complications between first two years (FTY) and second two years (STY). Results: The total number of patients was 197 with a mean age of 9.68 (±3.17) years, and 66% were boys. The percentages of performed computed tomography (CT) of FTY and STY were 46.2% and 25.5% (p<0.05). Patients who were evaluated by ultrasound alone were 53.8% and 74.5%, respectively (p<0.05). The NARs of the two groups were 13.2% (FTY) and 8.0% (STY) (p=0.19). There was no significant difference in the number of hospital days, drainage insertion rates, duration of draining, and the rates of perforations between groups. The duration of antibiotics use was significantly longer only in the STY group than in the FTY group (6.20±3.95 vs. 6.94±3.41 days, p=0.04). Conclusion: Although the number of patients who underwent ultrasound without a CT scan for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was increased, the NAR and clinically important complications were comparable from the preceding two years at a tertiary PED.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0