메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한마취통증의학회(구 대한마취과학회) Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Vol.66 No.2
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
127 - 130 (4page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: I-gelTM is a new single-use supraglottic airway device without an inflatable cuff. This study was designed to compare the usefulness of i-gelTM versus a classic laryngeal mask airway (cLMA) in small children. Methods: Sixty-three children (age range : 4-72 months) were randomly assigned to an i-gelTM or cLMA group. We evaluated hemodynamic data, airway sealing ability, the success rate of insertion, and adverse events including an inadvertent sliding out during ventilation. Results: Demographic data and hemodynamic data obtained immediately after the insertion of these devices did not differ between the two groups. The success rates for insertion on the first attempt were 77 and 84% for i-gelTM and cLMA, respectively (P = 0.54), and the overall success rates were 87 and 100% respectively (P = 0.14). There were no significant differences in terms of airway leak pressure. The inserted i-gelTM inadvertently slid out in 8 of 31 patients but only one sliding out case occurred in the cLMA group (P = 0.02). There were no differences between the groups in terms of other side effects (e.g., coughing, bleeding) associated with the use of i-gelTM and cLMA (P = 0.75 and 0.49, respectively). Conclusions: Oropharyngeal leak pressure and insertion success rate of i-gelTM are similar to those of cLMA. However, i-gelTM is prone to inadvertent sliding out of the mouth in small children. Therefore, it is recommended that the i-gelTM should be secured more tightly to avoid displacement of the device.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0