지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
While there are laws and regulations that can be construed as providing some protection for the attorney-client privilege regarding communications between an attorney and its client in Korea there is no law that specifically addresses such protection for the communications between the corporate attorney and its client.
This article examines some of the dynamics of the corporate attorney-client privilege in Korea and abroad, with particular attention to those in the United States and the European Union. This article explores some of the major issues surrounding the corporate attorney-client privilege in relation to several U.S.
and EU cases. Although it is understood that in the context of criminal proceedings the right to be represented by legal counsel is protected by the Korean constitution,the right to be assisted by legal counsel in the context of administrative or civil proceedings is not specifically addressed in the law in Korea. With the increase in the number of corporations that are exposed to such administrative,civil and criminal proceedings, it is becoming increasingly important to examine whether the corporate attorney-client privilege should protected by law in Korea.
The article argues that such corporate attorney-client privilege will serve its function of protecting the constitutional rights without interfering with the judicial and/or administrative systems by allowing such protection for communications that are clearly legal advise or opinion. It further concludes that affording corporate attorney-client privilege protection will enhance the compliance of laws and regulations by corporations by fostering an atmosphere of trust and transparency within the corporate attorney and its client.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0