메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국유방암학회 Journal of Breast Cancer Journal of Breast Cancer Vol.18 No.1
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
80 - 86 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Although various strategies have been reported, thereare no defined criteria for cosmetic evaluation methods afterbreast-conserving surgery (BCS). Since Asians tend to havesmaller breasts, indistinct inframammary folds, and conspicuousscars, differences in the cosmetic results are expected. So weexamined two subjective methods and one objective method todetermine the differences, and elements necessary for a cosmeticevaluation after BCS. Methods: Frontal photographs of 190Japanese were evaluated using the Harris scale (Harris) and theevaluation method proposed by the Japanese Breast Cancer SocietySawai group (Sawai group) as the subjective methods, andthe Breast Cancer Conservation Treatment cosmetic results(BCCT.core) as the objective method, respectively. In order to examinethe necessary elements for developing a new ideal method,100 out of 190 were selected and assessed separately by sixraters using both the Harris and modified Sawai group methodsin the observer assessment. The correlation between the twomethods was examined using the Spearman rank-correlation coefficient. Results: The results of the BCCT.core and the other twomethods were clearly different. In the observer assessment, theconsensuses of the six raters were evaluated as follows: 27, 27,26, and 20 cases were evaluated as “excellent,” “good,” “fair,”and “poor,” respectively. For the Spearman rank-correlation coefficient,values higher than 0.7 indicated a strong correlation, asseen by the values of 0.909 for the breast shape and 0.345 forthe scar. The breast shape accounted for the most significantpart of the evaluation, and the scar had very little correlation. Conclusion:In this study, we recognized a clear difference betweenthe subjective and objective evaluation methods, and identifiedthe necessary elements for cosmetic evaluation. We would like tocontinue developing an ideal cosmetic evaluation that is similar tosubjective one and is independent from raters.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0