지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.12
- 수록면
- 39 - 58 (20page)
- DOI
- 10.17262/KJPH.2021.12.58.2.39
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives: This study illustrates inequitable structural dynamics involved in the procurement and distribution of COVID-19 and other pandemic vaccines and argues for an ‘automatic stabilizer’ for more equitable vaccine distributions in future pandemics.
Methods: The methods used in this paper mainly involve game theoretical analysis of globally unequal vaccine distributions during the COVID-19 pandemic and a survey of relevant empirical literature on outcomes of this unequal vaccine distribution. The appendix applies four relevant ethical frameworks to deepen the normative discussion of issues that inequitable distributions of pandemic vaccines raise.
Results: The structural incentives involved in COVID-19 vaccine procurements and distributions make them multi-state prisoners’ dilemmas, likely to be replicated in similar future pandemics. The inequality which characterizes pandemic vaccine distributions is inequitable and therefore intuitively objectionable. Sufficient structural similarities between the distribution of economic resources during recessions and the distribution of vaccines during pandemics mean that there is a good candidate solution for inequitable pandemic vaccine distributions, namely an automatic stabilizer for vaccine stockpiles.
Conclusion: The prevention of unacceptable distributions of pandemic vaccines requires greater transparency on vaccine purchasing, manufacturing and distributions as well as politically credible pre-commitments to an equitable distribution of vaccines in future pandemics, plausibly through an international treaty regime.
Methods: The methods used in this paper mainly involve game theoretical analysis of globally unequal vaccine distributions during the COVID-19 pandemic and a survey of relevant empirical literature on outcomes of this unequal vaccine distribution. The appendix applies four relevant ethical frameworks to deepen the normative discussion of issues that inequitable distributions of pandemic vaccines raise.
Results: The structural incentives involved in COVID-19 vaccine procurements and distributions make them multi-state prisoners’ dilemmas, likely to be replicated in similar future pandemics. The inequality which characterizes pandemic vaccine distributions is inequitable and therefore intuitively objectionable. Sufficient structural similarities between the distribution of economic resources during recessions and the distribution of vaccines during pandemics mean that there is a good candidate solution for inequitable pandemic vaccine distributions, namely an automatic stabilizer for vaccine stockpiles.
Conclusion: The prevention of unacceptable distributions of pandemic vaccines requires greater transparency on vaccine purchasing, manufacturing and distributions as well as politically credible pre-commitments to an equitable distribution of vaccines in future pandemics, plausibly through an international treaty regime.
목차
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Should the COVID-19 Vaccine be Administered Simultaneously with Other Vaccines?
Infection and Chemotherapy
2021 .09
-
Exploring the experience of developing COVID-19 vaccines in Iran
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
2023 .01
-
Review of COVID-19 Vaccines and Their Evidence in Older Adults
Annals of geriatric medicine and research
2021 .01
-
Ongoing Clinical Trials of Vaccines to Fight against COVID-19 Pandemic
Immune Network
2021 .02
-
Coronavirus vaccine, development: present and future
한국실험동물학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2022 .01
-
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine platforms: how novel platforms can prepare us for future pandemics: a narrative review
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
2022 .04
-
Comparison of COVID-19 Vaccines Introduced in Korea
대한의생명과학회지
2022 .06
-
Vaccines in the United States: a systematic review on history of evolution, regulations, licensing, and future challenges
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
2020 .01
-
Factors influencing acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine in Malaysia: a web-based survey
Osong Public Health and Research Persptectives
2021 .12
-
항공종사자와 코로나바이러스감염증-19 백신 예방 접종
항공우주의학회지
2021 .04
-
Inside the story about the research and development of COVID-19 vaccines
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
2021 .01
-
Therapeutic Vaccines and Nucleic Acid Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease
지질·동맥경화학회지
2024 .09
-
Evaluation of stockpiled emergency vaccines for Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Korea, 2019-2021
예방수의학회지
2022 .12
-
Determinants of the willingness of the general population to get vaccinated against COVID-19 in a developing country
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
2021 .01
-
The Characteristics of RNA Vaccine
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY AND VIROLOGY
2016 .09
-
Parenteral, non-live rotavirus vaccine: recent history and future perspective
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
2021 .09
-
Should Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Infection Affect Our Confidence in the COVID-19 Vaccines?
Infection and Chemotherapy
2021 .12
-
Current development of therapeutic vaccines for the treatment of chronic infectious diseases
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
2024 .01
-
What We Do Know and Do Not Yet Know about COVID-19 Vaccines as of the Beginning of the Year 2021
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2021 .01
-
COVID-19 Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Lessons Learned From a Review of 10 Implementing Countries
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2024 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0