메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강민경 (충북대학교) 안대환 (충북대학교)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회논문집 大韓建築學會論文集 第37卷 第12號(通卷 第398號)
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
223 - 234 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As of 2020, the ‘1st Basic Plan for the Promotion of architectural Assets’ was carried out according to historical, scenic, artistic, and socio-cultural values for each city and province. When conducting the basic architectural asset survey, each city and province used the same value judgment criteria, but the value characteristics of architectural assets were different for each city. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between architectural assets and cities from the point of view of value judgment and the characteristics of architectural assets that appear in each city. Targeting Daejeon, Sejong, and Cheongju, the characteristics of the times of each city are identified. The characteristics were identified by classifying the types by historical, scenic, artistic, and socio-cultural values, which are the criteria for judging the value of architectural assets by city. As a result, historical values were given to the architectural assets that showed the characteristics of the times in the three cities. Sejong City, which developed relatively recently, gave historical value only to architectural assets in the form of hanok. Cheongju, with a long history, did not attach historical value to Gak Dang(閣堂). The scenic value is given to the architectural assets that harmonize with the surrounding environment. Daejeon and Cheongju were judged to be in harmony with the surrounding environment through the material and shape of the facade. Sejong City, where many buildings have been built in recent years, won the Architecture Award. In addition, a scenic value was given to architectural assets that would be in harmony with the natural scenic. Artistic value is given to architectural assets that reflect the characteristics of the times in architectural design and are in a good state of preservation. Also, Daejeon, Sejong, and Cheongju gave artistic value mainly to architectural assets that have won architectural awards. Through this study, it can be seen that the characteristics of architectural assets differ from city to city because the characteristics of cities and the criteria for value judgment for selecting architectural assets are related to each other. Accordingly, it shows that architectural assets should be preserved, managed, and utilized differently for each city.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 이론적 고찰
3. 도시별 건축자산 가치판단 기준 특성
4. 도시별 건축자산의 특성
5. 도시별 건축자산에 나타난 가치판단의 특징
6. 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0