메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정용상 (동국대학교)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제29권 제2호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
305 - 332 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to comparatively analyze the corporate governance of Malaysia by introducing its legislation history, describing the characteristics of corporate legislation and their various forms, and legally-appraising the country’s institution structure, through which it can help Korean industries actively lead their businesses in Malaysia. The company law of Malaysia were developed under the influence of the laws of England. Also, the company law in 1965 was established by accepting its later revision, and the companies’ acts of countries belonging to Anglo-American laws. Accordingly, its basic principle is very similar to that of the laws of England. It was revised in 1973. The company law of Malaysia are three kinds of company forms such as private enterprise, association enterprise, and corporation. The corporation largely takes the form of company, and the company is classified into four types such as company limited by shares, company limited by guarantee, and company limited by share guarantee, and unlimited company. General meeting, as a necessary permanent organization of decision- making on a company’s fundamental matters, has power as the highest organization on particulars based on articles of association. One problem of general meeting is that there is no act on the law about authority of the meeting even though it is necessary permanent organization and it has power as the highest organization on particulars based on the law and articles. It has complicated regulations on the holding time of general meeting. It seems to appropriate for the meeting to make the authority into law and supplement it by articles of incorporation on the exceptional matters. This system adopts the method of entrusting the right of the board to a single or multiple directors regarding the authority of the board of directors without a representative director system. This is not a normal shape of corporate governance. There is no problem in that authority allocation between general meeting and the board is regulated by articles of incorporation considering efficiency promotion, but however, it could ruin reliance interest on the opposite. The company law of Malaysia stipulates that all companies have audit system regardless of its type. It is beyond doubt that stipulation on the audit system should be applied to small scale and closed personal-od. Therefore, the corporate legislation of Malaysia needs some reforms to be suitable for global corporate governance standard and to secure its transparency and democracy on the company operation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0