메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이영주 (서울대학교 건축학과 석사과정) 존홍 (서울대 견축학부 교수)
저널정보
한국문화공간건축학회 한국문화공간건축학회논문집 한국문화공간건축학회논문집 제64호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
179 - 190 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A map as a situated representation is a result of complex political and cultural assertions. Even if not explicit, they reproduce ideological content that provides specific cognitive frames through which the reader understands a version of reality. In this way, representational methods reflected in historical maps of Seoul demonstrate a changing ideological position in regards to the object of the city and its socio-cultural structures. This paper investigates the differing cartographical methodologies of Seoul from the late Chosun period to the 1970s industrialization era, in correlation with the political and cultural shifts of each period, further arguing that the maps have been produced with ideological influence throughout the city's history. Particularly these maps show direct influence from emerging concepts of urban planning manifested through the numerous modifications caused by the rapidly changing political and cultural motives of different subjects. Taking maps of late Chosun dynasty as an analytical vantage point, a methodological shift first appears at the beginning of the 1910s to the mid-1920s. As the Japanese Empire transformed the city to visualize colonial power, the city becomes reinvented as a dialectic of the existing urban fabric and the colonial style architecture and road system. This perception of the city results in the ‘Gyeongsung sigado’ produced in the mid-1920s. Subsequently, the other major shift appears in the mid-1930s following the implementation of ‘Chosun Planning Ordinance,’ the first modern urban planning act on the Korean peninsula. This new pragmatic discourse focused on the expansion and efficiency of the city changed the priority of representation from the former ‘visualization constitutive interest’ to the ‘administration constitutive interest.’ As a concrete strategy of expansion and functionalization, the land rearrangement project based on a development logic of ‘Tabula Rasa’ urbanism also gave influence to the shift: Rather than depict what was already existing, the policy prioritized an emptying of the city ground plane to create a more ‘predictable’ future. This methodological tendency is highly evident in the policy’s main map, the ‘Daegyeongsung jeongdo,’ created in 1936. Finally, the paper concludes that the mapping of Seoul has stabilized after the 1960s industrialization and modernization period, with an emphasis on repetitive and pragmatic urban planning strategies that reflect an ideological logic of intensive expansion, development, and redevelopment.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0