지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.1
- 수록면
- 260 - 268 (9page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The comparison analysis between two certification systems is divided into three categories which are comparison of ①a number of evaluation items, ②a distribution chart of score percentage, ③detail evaluation items. Through a number of evaluation items, the purpose of certification system can be predicted. Also, a distribution chart of score percentage can help predict importance of certain items or factors. Those detail evaluation items which are slightly different according to different version standards which are composed of new version (G-SEED 2013, LEED v4). The score was calculated without the weighted value of G-SEED and detail score of LEED, and it is compared with not the rating of certification system but the score of compatibility. When it is compared only with the score, it is difficult to calculate for accurate rating. Therefore, the result will be come out with some percentage of compatibility through the percentage calculation method of certified cases. There is a limitation not to figure out accurate compatibility in this study because there were some exclusions, the weighted value of G-SEED and detail score of LEED. However, the possibility of compatibility can be figured out through the score percentage of certification standard. We contribute to secure. Getting out of obtaining LEED's certification recklessly, this research implies to contribute an insured green building certification system only through G-SEED certification.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0